The coronavirus has brought forth a crisis, which does not stop at borders and affects all areas of our life. European justice is not an exception in this regard.
This page aims to provide an overview of the measures taken within the European Union in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, which affect the judiciary, national authorities and legal practitioners, but also businesses and citizens.
As the situation is changing rapidly and information on this topic is still evolving, this page will be updated regularly to reflect new developments.
The Council of Europe has also created a webpage on national measures in the justice area in view of the COVID-19 pandemic. You can consult the page here.
There may be situations where citizens and businesses need to take procedural action in a cross-border case, but are unable to do so due to emergency measures taken in an EU Member State in order to counter the spread of COVID-19. These measures may result in:
The below table gives an overview of the information provided by the EJN contact points regarding the temporary measures taken in EU Member States
If you need additional information, please consult the webpages of the Ministry of Justice of the Member State for which you need information.
EFFECT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON TIME LIMITS
Time limits laid down in the EU legislation on civil judicial and commercial matters are not directly affected by special measures adopted by Member States.
Most deadlines governed by EU law do not have direct consequences when they expire , and their expiry in most cases will not lead to any direct consequences for authorities, courts, and citizens except causing potential delays.
In a number of other cases, the EU instruments establishing fixed time limits may also provide exemptions in exceptional circumstances , which could cover the current extraordinary situation, when for instance authorities or courts activities are seriously disturbed or even came to a standstill.
However, the expiry of other deadlines provided by EU instruments may deprive citizens or courts from the possibility to take procedural steps, such as appealing against a decision, with irreversible consequences in the judicial proceedings  and with no scope for an extension or derogation provided in that particular EU instrument. In such cases, it cannot be presumed from the outset that the circumstances resulting from this crisis justify a derogation from applicable Union law on time limits. At the same time it is clear that the COVID-19 crisis creates an exceptional situation which presents significant challenges for citizens and authorities alike, and may create situations where respecting the obligations set out by Union law is temporarily not possible, or is excessively difficult.
For this reason, the preservation of effective access to justice should be an important criterion when assessing:
For instance, overall restrictions on societal life affecting courts but also postal services as well as the possibility to consult a lawyer and prepare submissions to a court could jeopardize the access of citizens to justice. As a result, depending on the specific circumstances, it may be justified to not count the duration of the crisis towards procedural time limits. This may vary for different situations: if courts operate normally for urgent family law matters because they are a priority, one may insist also on the same deadlines.
In carrying out this assessment, a Member State’s decision on time limits being interrupted under national law may serve as an important point of reference (even if not directly legally affecting deadlines provided by EU law ) in order to consider whether effective access to justice is hindered to such an extent that the suspension of deadlines may also be considered justified for deadlines provided by EU law.
 In particular as regards the cooperation between authorities or courts, for instance deadlines set by Article 6 of 1393/2007 Regulation for the acknowledgement of receipt by the receiving agency or Article 13(4) of Directive 2002/08 on legal aid.
 See Article 11(3) of Brussels II a Regulation, or Art 18 of the EAPO Regulation.
 See for example Article 15(5) of the Brussels II a Regulation sets a 6 weeks time limit for another court to accept jurisdiction, resulting otherwise in the court first seized to continue to exercise jurisdiction, Article 6 of the Service of documents Regulation sets a one week time limit for the recipient to refuse the service of a document, Article 19(2) of the Maintenance Regulation establishes a 45 days time limit to apply for a review of a maintenance decision etc.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the shutdown of large parts of the economy has led to a drastic drop in the cash-flow of companies and to a threat of mass insolvencies. The table below provides an overview of measures taken by Member States in order to cope with this situation and to prevent insolvencies of viable businesses caused by this temporary shock. Such measures may concern:
Many Member States have imposed strict restrictions to prevent the spread of the coronavirus. This impacts also the judicial cooperation in criminal matters and the application of EU instruments.
The European Judicial Network (EJN) Secretariat is compiling information regarding international cooperation in criminal matters and is making it available under the special COVID-19 Section of the EJN website. As the access to some information is restricted, please contact your national contact point or the EJN Secretariat to request these details.
The COVID-19 crisis has an immediate impact on judicial cooperation in criminal matters, such as European Arrest Warrant (EAW) proceedings.
During the current crisis, there is a need for a swift and efficient exchange between Member States in the sensitive surrender proceedings. In this context, the Commission has launched, in close cooperation with Eurojust, the EJN (in criminal matters) and the General Secretariat of the Council, an EAW coordination group. The group may also be useful for other situations where a fast exchange between Member States is required, for example in reaction to judgments of the CJEU, having a direct impact on the smooth functioning of the EAW.
The COVID-19 outbreak also has an impact on the exercise of procedural rights of suspects and accused persons. Direct communication with lawyers, interpreters or with third persons (while the suspects or accused persons are deprived of liberty) is more difficult.
The use of audio- and video conferencing or other remote tools is encouraged. In addition, safety measures should be adopted, such as glass protections at police stations or in detention facilities, in order to enable the exercise of the right of access to lawyer or the right to an interpreter.
Also in times of COVID-19, the procedural rights of suspects and accused persons need to be respected in order to ensure fair proceedings. Limited derogations, which are provided for by the directives, if there are imperative requirements, should be interpreted restrictively by the competent authorities and not be employed on a large scale.
Under the Victims’ Rights Directive, Member States are obliged to ensure that all victims of crime have access to general and specialised support services that are confidential, free of charge and respond to victims’ individual needs. The access to support and protection that corresponds to victims’ specific needs should be available in all circumstances. This also includes the specific situation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Victims of domestic violence
The situation of victims of domestic violence is particularly aggravated by social distancing and isolation during periods of confinement. Persons with an abusive partner and children with abusive parents are on the one hand more exposed to coercive control, violence and neglect and on the other hand, their access to support and protection is more limited.
Member States are encouraged to take special measures of support and protection for victims of domestic violence within their national COVID-19 emergency schemes. In particular, it is crucial to ensure effective access to on- and off-line support services, including psychological aid and other social services. Victims of domestic violence in particular should have access to shelters, psychological aid, trauma support and counselling. National enforcement authorities should also be particularly vigilant to the registered and new cases of domestic violence. It is also crucial to ensure physical protection of victims.
Dedicated country-specific pages of the e-Justice Portal provide general information on how victims’ support and protection is organised in particular Member States.
Several actors (including EU agencies and support organisations) provide for practical information on how to ensure support and protection to victims during the COVID-19 pandemic situation:
Victims of cybercrime
According to EUROPOL, the COVID-19 pandemic brings new opportunities for criminals to abuse the fears and working conditions of citizens. The number of cyber-attacks is significant and expected to increase further. With a number of people teleworking from home, the chances for cybercriminals to exploit opportunities and vulnerabilities have multiplied.
EUROPOL has prepared prevention and awareness tips to help the general public stay cyber safe. During these times of increased risks, it is particularly important to use parental control to safeguard child’s online activity, secure electronic devices with passwords, PIN or biometric information and buy from reliable online vendors (after checking individual ratings).
More information about staying safe online can be found here.
Victims of hate crime
The Fundamental Rights Agency reports an increase in most EU Member States in incidents of racism, xenophobia and intolerance targeted at certain national or ethnic communities, which are linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Member State efforts regarding victims of hate crime should aim at fostering reporting of hate crime, improving accurate investigation of bias motivations and providing support to these victims.
As a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, national prison administrations are under pressure to limit the impact of the virus on the closed and vulnerable prison environment. Measures to avoid spreading the virus include the temporary suspension of all family visits and activities with outside persons, such as sport, professional or vocational training.
Both, staff and prisoners are concerned about their health. Prisoners suffer from the lack of activities and visits, which makes it a challenge to keep staff motivated and prevent riots by prisoners.
In particular, Member States, which face high rates of prison overcrowding, are compelled to take difficult decisions on a possible early release.
Most Member States have also postponed all physical transfers of prisoners under Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008.
The Commission aims to support Member States in their responses to address the situation in prisons by facilitating the exchange of information and best practices.
To that effect, reference is made to the list of useful websites below containing data on the issue of COVID-19 in prisons in different EU Member States websites:
The European Organisation of Prison and Correctional Services (EuroPris), an organisation which is co-funded under the European Commission’s Justice Programme, has a dedicated page on measures in European prisons in view of the COVD-19 crisis.
At the end of March 2020, EuroPris started a mailing group, bringing together experts (currently totalling 84 experts) and sharing daily updates of all incoming responses and questions.
Daily updates can also be consulted on their website.
The Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) has published a statement of principles relating to the treatment of persons deprived of their liberty in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
More information related to COVID-19 and prisons and probation can be found on the Council of Europe’s web site including the latest Statistiques Penales Annuelles du Conseil de l’Europe (SPACE) 2019.
IPS Innovative Prison Systems has issued a Basic Guide for Decision-Makers on Worldwide Practices and Recommendations, COVID-19 Pandemic Response Fighting the invisible threat in prisons, Joana Apóstolo, Rita Martins and Pedro das Neves
The UN Subcommittee for the Prevention of Torture (SPT):
At its last February session, the SPT issued an advice to National Preventive Mechanisms (NPMs) on the issue.
On 30 March 2020, the SPT has issued detailed advice on a range of actions governments and independent monitoring bodies should take to protect people deprived of their liberty during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Penal Reform International (PRI) has published a briefing note, Coronavirus: Healthcare and human rights of people in prison
The European Prison Observatory (EPO), a network of European NGOs coordinated by Antigone since 2012, has collected information on how European countries are dealing with the virus, including a report "COVID-19: what is happening in European prisons?" and an interactive map with brief information for each Member State.
The WHO Regional Office for Europe has published interim guidance on how to deal with the COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention.
The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, has made a statement on COVID-19 pandemic: Urgent steps are needed to protect the rights of prisoners in Europe.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 has also an effect on the work of probation in the EU. Organisations create new ways of working and provide additional instructions for staff in managing their work and responsibilities. The Confederation of European Probation (CEP), an organisation which is co-funded under the European Commission’s Justice programme, publishes information, measures and protocols on how probation services all over Europe are dealing with the COVID-19 outbreak.
They have identified common practices and developed recommendations on COVID-19 in the Probation sector:
A number of Member States have made a move to strengthen the use of digital tools by the judiciary in view of the crisis caused by the coronavirus.
The below table provides information about the temporary measures taken in Member States:
This page is maintained by the European Commission. The information on this page does not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission. The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice with regard to copyright rules for European pages.
The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.