Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: 1/2014
    • Member State: Malta
    • Common Name:Il-Pulizija vs Scicluna et
    • Decision type: Court decision, first degree
    • Decision date: 21/10/2014
    • Court: Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a court of criminal judicature
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff: Il-Pulizija
    • Defendant: Jeason Michael Angelo Scicluna u Joseph Coppini
    • Keywords: price indication
  • Directive Articles
    Price Indication Directive, link
  • Headnote
    Objects for sale must comply with the requisites of Legal Notice 283 of 2002 (implementing the provisions of the Directive 98/6), and must therefore clearly indicate the price.
  • Facts
    Defendants were arraigned by the police after officials from the Consumer Affairs Department inspected the shop operated by defendants and , particularly in the shop window, there were no price indications for the goods for sale.
  • Legal issue
    The court concluded that not all the goods for sale satisfied the requirements of Legal Notice 283 of 2002 (which implements Directive 98/6 into Maltese law). It noted that it found it hard to believe that every time the office from the Consumer Affairs Department made an inspection, the sales girl or the owner were in the process of pricing the goods. It therefore found that the prosecution had proven its case.
  • Decision

    Must objects being placed for sale have a clear indication of price?

    URL: http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/courtservices/Judgements/search.aspx?func=all

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The court found the defendant guilty of most of the charges made against them and find them two hundred and fifty euro jointly.