Sodna praksa

  • Podatki o zadevi
    • Nacionalna ID: Sodba II U 353/2012
    • Država članica: Slovenija
    • Splošno ime:N/A
    • Vrsta odločbe: Upravna odločba, prva stopnja
    • Datum odločbe: 16/01/2013
    • Sodišče: Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (zunanji oddelek v Mariboru)
    • Zadeva:
    • Tožnik: N/A
    • Toženec: Trade Inspection of the Republic of Slovenia
    • Ključne besede: misleading advertising, misleading statements, prizes
  • Členi direktive
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1., (d)
  • Uvodna opomba
    Claiming that a prize will be received for free, whereas in reality the consumer is obliged to pay an income tax on this prize, constitutes misleading advertising.
  • Dejstva
    The case at hand is a first-instance decision in an administrative dispute procedure, following an administrative procedure.

    The plaintiff, in the course of his business, was advertising that when buying six electronics packages, one of those six packages would be received "for free".

    The defendant held that this constituted misleading advertising due to income tax being payable.

  • Pravna zadeva
    Does claiming that a prize will be received for free, whereas in reality the consumer is obliged to pay an income tax on this prize, constitute misleading advertising?
  • Odločba

    Rather than formally being a part of the decision of the court in this case, the court simply reiterated the decision and reasoning of the defendant in the administrative procedure.

    Namely, any prize received by a consumer without consideration cannot be considered free since the consumer is required to pay income tax on that prize.

    URL: http://www.sodisce.si/znanje/sodna_praksa/upravno_sodisce_rs/2012032113056227/

    Celotno besedilo: Celotno besedilo

  • Povezane zadeve

    Zadetki niso na voljo

  • Pravna literatura

    Zadetki niso na voljo

  • Zadetek
    The plaintiff's request was denied.