Ítélkezési gyakorlat

  • Az ügy részletei
    • Nemzeti azonosító: 94/2012. VJ
    • Tagállam: Magyarország
    • Közhasználatú név:N/A
    • Határozat típusa: Közigazgatási határozat, elsőfok
    • A határozat napja: 16/09/2013
    • Bíróság: Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (Budapest)
    • Tárgy:
    • Felperes: Hungarian Competition Authority
    • Alperes: An international airline company
    • Kulcsszavak: conditional promotions, material information, misleading advertising, price reductions
  • Az irányelv cikkei
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1., (b) Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 1. Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 2.
  • Megjegyzés
    It constitutes a misleading commercial practice to omit to mention material conditions which must be fulfilled to enjoy a trader's offer.
  • Tények
    The defendant published its discount priced plane tickets between July and September 2012 in newsletters, magazines, flyers, and on its own website.

    The main message for the consumers was that the HUF 49 and HUF 99 priced tickets were available for all destinations from Budapest.

    However, in reality, the discount was only applicable in relation to one or two destinations, and for only one direction.

  • Jogi kérdés
    Does it constitute a misleading commercial practice to omit to mention material conditions which must be fulfilled to enjoy a trader's offer?
  • Határozat

    The Authority established that the defendant violated the law by publishing misleading information in its advertisements, suggesting that the reduced priced tickets were available in all destinations of the defendant taking off from Budapest.

    URL: http://www.gvh.hu/domain2/files/modules/module25/2428105079E59E300.pdf

    Teljes szöveg: Teljes szöveg

  • Kapcsolódó ügyek

    Nincs találat

  • Jogi szakirodalom

    Nincs találat

  • Eredmény
    The Competition Authority imposed a fine of HUF 10,000,000 (approx. EUR 33,000) on the defendant.