Ítélkezési gyakorlat

  • Az ügy részletei
    • Nemzeti azonosító: 37/2012. VJ
    • Tagállam: Magyarország
    • Közhasználatú név:N/A
    • Határozat típusa: Közigazgatási határozat, elsőfok
    • A határozat napja: 21/02/2013
    • Bíróság: Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (Budapest)
    • Tárgy:
    • Felperes: Hungarian Competition Authority
    • Alperes: Multinational telecommunications company
    • Kulcsszavak: comparative advertising, misleading advertising, misleading commercial practices
  • Az irányelv cikkei
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1., (b)
  • Megjegyzés
    It constitutes a misleading commercial practice to state that a service has a certain coverage, whereas in reality it appears that that service does not offer such coverage.
  • Tények
    The Competition Authority examined the so-called "Rally" campaign of the defendant, popularizing its mobile internet network. The defendant published advertisements in several different media, including TV publicity, the defendant's website, online advertisements, etc., stating that its mobile internet network is "countrywide" and accessible "everywhere".

    Based on thorough examinations, the Authority found that this information was not correct.

    Furthermore, besides positively praising its own services, the defendant in the TV commercials criticized severely the network accessibility of its competitors. In summary, the basic message of the commercial was that the defendant's services are "countrywide" and accessible "everywhere", while the network of its two competitors could not offer such guarantees.

  • Jogi kérdés
    Does it constitute a misleading commercial practice to state that a service has a certain coverage, whereas in reality it appears that that service does not offer such coverage?
  • Határozat

    The Competition Authority, taking into account that it was established that the coverage of the services was not actually "countrywide", decided that the commercial in question constituted a misleading commercial practice.

    The Authority, while assessing the fine to be imposed on the defendant, also took into consideration the aggravating fact that the commercial was broadcasted during an intensive 2 months, thus having reached a significant number of consumers, and that the defendant had previously been fined already for unfair commercial practices towards consumers.

    URL: http://www.gvh.hu/domain2/files/modules/module25/22883F81D59694225.pdf

    Teljes szöveg: Teljes szöveg

  • Kapcsolódó ügyek

    Nincs találat

  • Jogi szakirodalom

    Nincs találat

  • Eredmény
    The Competition Authority imposed a fine of HUF 30,000,000 (approx. EUR 100,000) on the defendant.