Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: Vj-127/2010/22.
    • Member State: Hungary
    • Common Name:link
    • Decision type: Administrative decision, first degree
    • Decision date: 20/10/2011
    • Court: Hungarian Competition Authority (Budapest)
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff: Hungarian Competition Authority
    • Defendant: Aeroviva Kft.
    • Keywords: advertisement, discounts, misleading advertising, payment, price reductions, travel
  • Directive Articles
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1. Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 6, 1., (d)
  • Headnote
    The announcement of a reduced price without stating further conditions to enjoy such discounted price, whereas in reality a certain payment method must be used to obtain the discount, constitutes a misleading commercial practice.
  • Facts
    The defendant, a travel agency, conducted a campaign on its websites to promote its services. The promotion tool included a basic price that was crossed out and replaced with a new price. No further conditions were stated on the advertisement for the reduction to apply.

    However, there was a reasonable doubt as to whether the announced discounts were indeed offered to the consumers without any further conditions to be fulfilled.

     
  • Legal issue
    The Authority ruled that defendant did not offer the discounted price automatically, as it was established that the discounted price could only be obtained on the condition of paying in instalments.

    As a result, the Authority stated, the crossed out price in the promotion is misleading as it gives the impression that it is applicable regardless of the payment method used.

    Finally, the Authority held that the defendant thus had failed to properly inform the consumers by providing the necessary information on the conditions to enjoy the announced price discount. This is likely to distort the economic behaviour of the consumers so as to induce them to take a transactional decision that they would not have taken otherwise.
  • Decision

    Does the announcement of a reduced price, without stating further conditions to enjoy such discounted price, whereas in reality a certain payment method must be used to obtain the discount, constitute a misleading commercial practice?

    URL: http://www.gvh.hu/domain2/files/modules/module25/18565BF5D1547A245.pdf

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The Authority determined this behaviour as infringing but did not impose a fine, as only a small sphere of customers had been affected and also due to the fact that the company ceased its activities publicly.