Case law

  • Case Details
    • National ID: I-4 U 192/07, 4 U 192/07
    • Member State: Germany
    • Common Name:link
    • Decision type: Court decision in appeal
    • Decision date: 13/03/2008
    • Court: Higher Regional Court (Hamm)
    • Subject:
    • Plaintiff:
    • Defendant:
    • Keywords: identity of the trader, material distortion, misleading omissions
  • Directive Articles
    Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 1, Article 2, (e) Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 1. Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Chapter 2, Section 1, Article 7, 5.
  • Headnote
    The complete absence of any reference to the company register and the company registration number on a website constitutes an unfair commercial practice. This can no longer be regarded as a bagatelle under unfair competition legislation since the UCP Directive came into force, in particular when it is difficult for a consumer to independently obtain information about the company.
  • Facts
    An internet service provider did not reveal any information on its website regarding the commercial register where its company was registered, nor about its company registration number.

    The internet service provider was organised as a "Limited" type of company, for which consumers cannot obtain any information from an independent body.

    The plaintiff requested to cease and desist this commercial practice.
  • Legal issue
    The court found that, since the UCP Directive came into force, the German Unfair Competition Act (UWG) has to be interpreted in the light of the UCP Directive.

    According to the first draft of the new UWG of the German ministry of justice, Sec. 3, para. 2, 2nd sentence UWG holds that a commercial practice must noticeably impair the economic behaviour of consumers in order to be prohibited. This will be the case when a consumer protection provision of a European Directive or European Regulation would be violated in such a way that obligatory information duties are infringed. According to the court, such information duty also includes the requirement to convey the company registration number, as set forth by article 5 of the eCommerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and implemented by Sec. 5 of the German Telemedia Act. Therefore, according to the court, the absence of such information constitutes a violation of §3 UWG.
  • Decision

    Does the failure to communicate the company register and the company registration number data constitute an unfair commercial practice? 

    Full text: Full text

  • Related Cases

    No results available

  • Legal Literature

    No results available

  • Result
    The plaintiff's request was granted.