‘Maintenance’ is understood to be everything which is essential for the sustenance, housing and clothing of a person. Maintenance also includes the education and instruction of the person if he or she is an underage child.
According to the law, the following are required to pay maintenance in the order indicated:
In addition to the aforementioned cases in which the maintenance obligation is legally determined, maintenance obligations may also result from a bequest (maintenance bequest left in a will) or a contract.
A child may benefit from maintenance until his or her majority, which is reached at 18 years of age. Between the ages of 16 and 18, children may be emancipated by marriage.
There are differences between the rules of substantive law applying to child and adult maintenance: adult maintenance only covers the costs of sustenance, housing and clothing while child maintenance covers the costs of training and education in addition to these costs.
If, after a child reaches majority or emancipation, they decide to continue their training or education, they may bring maintenance proceedings against their parents. In this case, maintenance covers the costs of their education and training, in addition to their sustenance, housing and clothing. The duration of these payments is to be determined by agreement or decision. This decision sets the appropriate duration for a reasonable period of training or education.
In the exceptional situation described above, in which an adult child is continuing their training, adult maintenance includes the costs of training and education. In particular, the law assumes that when maintenance is requested for an adult child, until the said child reaches 25 years of age, the maintenance payment set when the child was a minor is maintained. In this case, the burden falls on the parent who has been mandated to prove that the maintenance payment set when the child was a minor is no longer necessary or is excessive since the child has achieved majority.
The rules of civil procedure which apply to the setting and enforcement of child and adult maintenance also differ in some cases. The differences in the applicable procedural rules are referred to in the replies to the questions ‘Should I apply to a competent authority or a court to obtain maintenance? What are the main elements of this procedure?’ and ‘If the person concerned (debtor) doesn't pay voluntarily, what action can be taken in order to force him/her to pay?’
The response to this question varies depending on the situations outlined below.
Setting child maintenance and maintenance between spouses in the event of an original agreement
The person who is obliged to pay maintenance and the person who is entitled to receive it may agree on its setting. In the case of child maintenance or maintenance between spouses, the parties may request that the agreement be approved before the court or before the Public Registrar (Conservador do Registo Civil), depending on whether the following circumstances apply.
In the event of contested divorce, an agreement may nevertheless be reached regarding the maintenance of minor children. In such a case, approval of the agreement on maintenance for minor children must be sought from the Court in the proceedings to regulate the exercise of parental responsibilities. The following subheading outlines the main elements of these proceedings.
In the event of divorce by mutual consent, the Public Registrar is requested to approve the agreement on maintenance between spouses and/or for minor children. The Registrar has sole jurisdiction for these proceedings, which may be brought in any Civil Registry. With regard to agreements on child maintenance, the Public Prosecutor at the court in the area of the Civil Registry where the proceedings were brought must give its prior opinion. If the agreement is approved, the divorce is decreed. If the agreement is not approved, the divorce process by mutual consent is referred to the court where the divorce proceedings by mutual consent will be heard. In this case, the court is responsible for assessing and approving agreements regarding child maintenance or maintenance between spouses.
The same rules apply in the event of legal separation, declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage.
Even if it is not a case of divorce or separation, if there is an agreement, the parents must refer the agreement governing parental responsibility or any changes thereto for approval to the Civil Registry in a similar manner to that set out above.
Setting maintenance when there is no original agreement
Maintenance from parents to minor children
In the event of contested divorce, protective court proceedings to regulate the exercise of parental responsibility are requested to set child maintenance. The parents may later request the approval of the agreement on parental responsibility. Failing such an agreement or if it is not approved, the Public Prosecutor requests the regulating of the exercising of parental responsibility. The procedure is conducted in court. The parents are summoned to a meeting to which the minor and other relatives may also be called. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached at the meeting, the judge sets a provisional regime of parental responsibility and the parties are sent for mediation or to a specialised technical hearing. If it still proves to be impossible to reach an agreement, the parents are notified to submit pleadings and evidence. This is followed by disclosure, the trial and judgement.
The same rules apply in the event of legal separation, declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage.
Maintenance from parents or others obliged to pay child maintenance
Child maintenance may also be set by protective child maintenance proceedings, whenever, for example, proceedings need to be brought against persons obliged to pay such maintenance specifically for this purpose. These proceedings are also intended to amend maintenance that was previously set. This takes place in court. It begins with an application accompanied by the following items: certificates proving the degree of kinship or affinity existing between the child and the defendant; a copy of the judgement which previously set maintenance, where applicable; a list of witnesses. The defendant is summoned. A meeting is then called to try and reach an agreement between the parties. If no agreement is reached, this is followed by the defence, disclosure, trial and judgement.
Maintenance for an adult or emancipated child
The procedure for setting maintenance for an adult or emancipated child may be brought before any Civil Registry, upon submission of an application indicating the pleas of fact and law relied on. The application must be accompanied by documentary evidence and indicate all other evidence. The defendant is summoned. If they do not object, the application is well-founded and maintenance is set by decision of the Registrar. If they do object, the Registrar attempts to reconcile the parties. If reconciliation proves impossible, the case is filed by the Registrar and referred to the competent court for trial.
If a court case already exists during which child maintenance was set, the application to set maintenance for a child who has since reached adulthood or been emancipated, is joined to the pre-existing case and heard in this court and not in the Civil Registry.
Between spouses and former spouses
When there is no original agreement, the procedure for setting maintenance between spouses and former spouses is brought before the court. The procedure takes the form of a declaratory action, with an identical procedure to that outlined below for adult maintenance.
Aside from the aforementioned cases, the procedure for setting adult maintenance is brought before the court (e.g. maintenance request made by the parent to the children). The procedure takes the form of a condemnatory declaratory judgement. It begins with the initial application being submitted to court.
In this request, the filing party must designate the court in which the action is being brought, identify the parties, indicate their names, places of residence or offices and, where possible, their occupations and places of work, set out the form of proceedings, explain the facts and legal reasons forming the grounds for the action, make the request and declare the amount involved in the case. At the end of the application, the list of witnesses is submitted and the other evidence requested. Documents showing evidence of prior payment of the initial court fee and power of attorney must be attached to the request, if represented by a lawyer. Alternatively, a document proving that legal aid has been granted may be attached.
If a lawyer is appointed, the initial application is submitted electronically via a form available on the https://citius.tribunaisnet.mj.pt/ web page in accordance with the procedures and instructions explained therein. If the party is not represented by a legal representative, they may submit the request at the court registry offices in one of the following ways: in person; by registered post; or by sending a fax.
The defendant is summoned. If no agreement is reached during proceedings, they are followed by the mandatory stages of the defence, conclusive opening order, disclosure, trial and judgement.
In the case of child maintenance, the request may be made by the child's legal representative, by the Public Prosecutor, by the person to whom custody has been granted or by the director of the educational or care establishment to which the minor is entrusted. Anyone may notify the Public Prosecutor of the need to set child maintenance.
In the case of maintenance due to incapacitated adults, proceedings may be brought by their legal representatives.
Aside from these cases of incapacity, maintenance proceedings for adults or emancipated children must be brought by them, by a legal representative appointed by them or by an attorney to whom they have conferred power of attorney to bring the proceedings.
However, the law provides for the following particularity with respect to adult children: the parent who takes on the main responsibility of paying the expenses of adult or emancipated children who are unable to look after themselves may demand that the other parent contribute to the sustenance and education of the said adult children. This contribution may be made in whole or in part to the adult or emancipated children, when the judge so deems or if the parents agree.
The District Court, Family and Juvenile Court (Tribunal de Comarca, Juízo de Família e Menores) has jurisdiction over matters involving protective proceedings to regulate the exercise of parental responsibility and set child maintenance. In the absence of a Family and Juvenile Court, the case will, in principle, be heard in the District Court, Local Instance or General Jurisdiction Court (Tribunal de Comarca, Juízo Local or Juízo de Competência Genérica).
To understand which of the aforementioned courts has territorial jurisdiction, the following rules apply. In principle, the court competent for the place in which the child is resident at the time the proceedings are started has jurisdiction.
If the residence of the child is unknown, the court competent for the place of residence of the holders of parental responsibility has jurisdiction.
If the holders of parental responsibility are resident in different places, the court competent is that of the place of residence of the person to whom custody of the child has been granted or, in the case of joint custody, that of the person with whom the child lives.
If any of the proceedings relate to two or more children who are children of the same parents and resident in different districts, the court competent for the place of residence of the greatest number of such children has jurisdiction. All other things being equal, the court in which the maintenance was requested in the first instance has jurisdiction.
If, when the proceedings are started, the child does not live in Portugal, the court competent for the place of residence of the applicant or the defendant has jurisdiction; if they also live abroad and the Portuguese court has jurisdiction internationally, the case is heard by the District Court of Lisbon, Family and Juvenile Court (Tribunal da Comarca de Lisboa, Juízo de Família e Menores), as this court has territorial jurisdiction for the municipality of Lisbon.
Maintenance for adult children
Any Civil Registry has jurisdiction to bring maintenance proceedings for adult children. This does not apply only if a court case already exists in which child maintenance was set. In this case, the application to set maintenance for a child who has, in the meantime, reached majority or been emancipated, is joined to the pre-existing case and heard in this court.
Maintenance for spouses or former spouses
The procedure for setting maintenance between spouses and former spouses is brought before the District Court, Family and Children's Court competent for the place where the defendant resides. In the absence of a Family and Children's Court, the case will, in principle, be heard in the District Court, Local Instance or General Jurisdiction Court.
Aside from the aforementioned cases, the procedure for setting adult maintenance is brought before the District Court: Central Instance, Civil Court (if the value of the action exceeds €50 000.00); the Local Instance or General Jurisdiction Court, where one exists (if the value of the action does not exceed €50 000.00). From a territorial point of view, the court competent for the place of residence of the defendant has jurisdiction.
The courts shown below have jurisdiction when it comes to bringing special maintenance enforcement proceedings, in the event of late payment.
If proceedings in which maintenance was set were heard before the District Court, Family and Juvenile Court, the special maintenance enforcement proceedings will be heard before this court, as part of the respective case, to which the enforcement application must be joined.
If the proceedings in which maintenance was set were heard before the District Court, Central Instance, Civil Court (Tribunal de Comarca, Juízo Central Cível), the Enforcement Court (Secção de Execução) which would be competent if the proceedings were not within the jurisdiction of that court of Central Instance owing to their monetary value, has jurisdiction for the special maintenance enforcement.
Where there is no Enforcement Court, the Civil Court of Central Instance where the respective declaratory action was heard has jurisdiction for the special maintenance enforcement and, in this case, the enforcement takes place in this procedure.
If the proceedings in which maintenance was set took place at the District Court, Local Civil Instance or General Jurisdiction Court, the enforcement takes place in this procedure provided the Central Instance does not have an Enforcement Court. If there is an Enforcement Court (whose territorial jurisdiction covers the area in which the General Jurisdiction or Local Civil Court where the condemnatory action was heard is located), it will have jurisdiction for the special maintenance enforcement.
With regard to the enforcement of court judgements, even if the enforcement does not take place in the court in which the enforceable judgement was handed down, the enforcement application is submitted in the declaratory proceedings where that judgement was handed down. In this case, when the Enforcement Court has jurisdiction, the sentencing court will urgently forward a copy of the sentence, the application that gave rise to the enforcement and accompanying documents to the Enforcement Court.
The same rule applies in cases where there is no Enforcement Court and the Local Civil Court or General Jurisdiction Court have jurisdiction with regard to enforcement proceedings.
If the proceedings in which maintenance was set were not heard before the court but rather before the Civil Registry, territorial jurisdiction for the special maintenance enforcement is governed by the following principles:
With regard to the substantive jurisdiction for maintenance enforcement based on the decision of the Registrar, the following rules apply:
The District Court, Family and Juvenile Court has the jurisdiction to prepare and judge maintenance enforcement proceedings between spouses and former spouses, for children and for adult and emancipated children. As in this case, however, the respective declaratory action was not heard in the Family and Children's Court, but rather in the Civil Registry, the courts may recognise that the District Court, Enforcement Court has jurisdiction.
If there is no Enforcement Court, the Local Civil Instance or General Jurisdiction Court has jurisdiction for special maintenance enforcement.
The aforementioned rules on jurisdiction are subject to fluctuations in the interpretation of the national courts.
As a general rule, it is not necessary to appoint a lawyer for child maintenance proceedings, except at the appeal stage. Adult or emancipated applicants (e.g. the child's guardian) may appear on their own in court when the proceedings are being heard at the Court of First Instance. However, the child must be allocated a lawyer when the interests of the child and his or her parents, of the legal representative or of the person who has de facto custody are conflicting, and also when a child who is sufficiently mature requests the court.
For other maintenance proceedings, the general principles set out below apply.
It is necessary to appoint a lawyer: in those cases within the jurisdiction of courts with a limit, in which ordinary appeal is admissible; in cases where appeal is always admissible, irrespective of the value; in appeals and cases brought before the higher courts.
Currently, in 2019, ordinary appeal is only admissible when the value of the case exceeds the limit of the court against which the appeal is brought and the decisions challenged are unfavourable to the appellant by an amount also exceeding half of the limit of that court. In the event of doubts concerning the value of the loss, only the value of the action will be taken into account. This legal principle has various exceptions laid down therein and in other specific legal provisions. In 2019, at the time of reviewing this factsheet, in civil matters, the limit of the courts is as follows: Court of Appeal (Tribunal da Relação) – €30 000.00; Court of First Instance (Tribunal de Primeira Instância) – €5 000.00.
Although it is necessary to appoint a lawyer, trainee lawyers, solicitors and the parties themselves may make applications which do not raise questions of law.
The reply to this question varies depending on whether the procedure to set maintenance is heard in court or the Civil Registry and whether the parties benefit from legal aid or not. Costs are due in the courts. Fees are due in the Civil Registry Office.
Costs in cases within the jurisdiction of the courts
Minors are exempt from costs when they are represented by the Public Prosecutor or by a court-appointed lawyer in cases heard in court and are exempt from fees in cases that take place at the Civil Registry Office.
Minors or their legal representatives are also exempt from costs in appeals against decisions relating to the application, amendment or termination of maintenance, handed down in juvenile court proceedings. Juvenile court proceedings in which maintenance can be set are usually child maintenance proceedings and proceedings to regulate parental responsibility. These are special, non-contentious cases.
Parties in juvenile court proceedings are exempt from the prior payment of court fees, including those proceedings in which maintenance is set. In these cases, instead of paying the court fee up-front, the party is requested to pay the court fee within a ten day period after a sentence has been handed down in the main proceedings. This is the case even if the sentence has not been rendered final.
Aside from the cases mentioned above, costs are due in principle. This will only not be the case if the party benefits from legal aid and/or if chapter V of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December, which will be mentioned below, applies to the proceedings in question.
Apart from the exceptions noted above, an initial court fee is due in order to bring an action aimed at setting maintenance. The initial court fee corresponds to an advance on the final costs.
The costs include the court fee, charges and the costs of the party.
In order to find out the amount of court fees due, it is essential to know the value of the action, as the court fee is calculated on the basis of this amount, in accordance with one of the tables annexed to the Regulation on Procedural Costs.
For the purposes of applying the aforementioned tables:
Table I – A of the Procedural Costs Regulations applies in the following cases: cases of definitive maintenance for adults or adult or emancipated children that follow the common form; special procedures (divorce or juvenile court) in which maintenance is set, where applicable, for the spouses, minor children or adult or emancipated children. The court fee due is expressed in UC (unit of account).
In 2019 (at the time of writing of this factsheet) the value of 1 UC is €102.00. This value is usually updated every year and it is therefore necessary to consult the updated national legislation. In 2019, the value of the court fee due, according to Table I-A of the Procedural Costs Regulations, is as follows, depending on the value of the action:
Over €275 000.00, the value of the court fee increases by 3 UC per €25 000.00 or part thereof.
In the cases of precautionary proceedings to set provisional maintenance, pre-enforcement hearings in order to recover maintenance due to minors, and special maintenance enforcement, Table II - A applies, as annexed to the Procedural Costs Regulations. The following values can be taken as an example (2019):
(In the case of enforcement measures being carried out by a bailiff)
(In the case of enforcement proceedings carried out by an enforcement solicitor)
In the aforementioned cases in which the court fee is variable, the party initially pays the minimum amount and only pays the outstanding amount at the end, if applicable.
In declaratory action in which maintenance is set, the court's final judgement must rule on costs. If the proceedings are partially successful, the costs are paid by both parties in proportion to their respective loss. If one of the parties loses completely, they are ordered to pay all the costs. In the event of a court-approved agreement between the parties, as a rule the costs are borne by both parties in equal proportion.
In the case of a special maintenance enforcement, the costs are taken from the proceeds of the seized property.
The following rules apply to the charges:
With regard to expenses and charges arising from investigations (payment to experts, reporting, etc.), the rule is that each party pays the expenses and charges to which it has given rise.
If the investigation proves to be manifestly unnecessary or dilatory, the party that requested it bears the respective charge regardless of the deadline or ruling on costs.
When all parties have an interest in the investigations or the expenditure, when they both gain equal advantage, or when it is not possible to determine who is the interested party, the charges are borne equally by the parties.
Costs of the parties
With regard to the costs of the parties, the rule is as follows: the costs of the successful party are borne by the losing party on a sliding scale in proportion to their loss.
The costs of the parties include court fees paid in advance, the costs actually incurred by the party, the fees paid to the enforcement agent and their expenditure, the fees paid to the legal representative and their expenditure.
Except in the cases noted above, in which the parties are exempt from the advance payment of court fees, in principle, the court clerk only prepares the costs account after the judgement has been rendered final and unappealable, and in accordance with the respective sentence. The parties are notified of the account.
If there are no appeals or claims regarding the account or these have been resolved, this gives rise to the payment of what is due by the losing party and/or the reimbursement of the successful party for the amount advanced.
The costs of the parties are paid directly by the losing party to the party owed. If the losing party has legal aid, the payment of the sums in questions to the party owed is made by the State (in 2019, at the time of reviewing of this factsheet, payment is made by the Institute of Financial Management and Justice Infrastructure (Instituto de Gestão Financeira e Equipamentos da Justiça IP)).
Legal aid in cases within the jurisdiction of the courts
If the applicant does not have the means to pay for the proceedings, they may obtain legal aid. According to national legislation, legal aid may only be granted to natural persons or not-for-profit legal persons.
Legal aid for individuals may be granted in various forms: legal advice; exemption from court fees and charges; phased payment of court fees and charges; appointment and payment of the legal representative's fees; appointment and phased payment of the legal representative's fees; assignment of an enforcement agent.
The Portuguese legal aid system, in all the terms laid down therein, applies to all courts and to any form of proceedings.
Applications for legal aid are to be submitted via a form. This must be delivered in person or mailed to any Institute of Social Security IP (Instituto da Segurança Social IP) customer service centre. The forms and instructions regarding their completion are provided by that entity. The general response period is thirty days.
When bringing an action, the applicant must attach to the initial application documentary evidence of prior payment of the court fee due or of the granting of legal aid in terms of exemption from prior payment of the aforementioned fee. When legal aid is granted in terms of the phased payment of court fees, evidence of this must be attached along with payment of the outstanding amount.
Fees in cases within the jurisdiction of the Civil Registry Office
Minors are exempt from fees when they are represented by the Public Prosecutor or by a court-appointed lawyer in cases that are heard before the Civil Registry Office.
The fees due for cases within the jurisdiction of Civil Registry Offices are set out in the Fee Regulations for Registry Offices and Notaries.
For example, in 2019 the fees (which can be consulted at: http://www.irn.mj.pt/sections/irn/legislacao/docs-legislacao/regulamento-emolumentar/) charged in cases within the jurisdiction of Civil Registry Offices are as follows:
These sums are valid for 2019, the time of updating of this factsheet, and are subject to review. It is therefore necessary to consult national legislation on a case by case basis.
Legal aid in cases within the jurisdiction of the Civil Registry Office
Legal aid only applies in two situations to cases heard before the Civil Registry Office: appointment and payment of the legal representative's fees; appointment and phased payment of the legal representative's fees.
Furthermore, in Civil Registry Offices, certain acts are free of charge for individual applicants who are able to prove their financial insufficiency.
Financial insufficiency may be proved by the following means: a document issued by the competent administrative authority; a statement issued by a public social welfare institution where the individual is resident.
In these cases, the following acts are free of charge: acts of civil registry or nationality; processes and statements relating to these; documents required and procedures relating to their supply; certificates required for any purpose.
The same rule applies to cases within the jurisdiction of the Civil Registry Office in which maintenance was set.
As a rule, maintenance is set as monthly monetary payments, except where there is an agreement or legal provision to the contrary or where there are reasons to justify exceptional measures. If, for example, the person required to pay maintenance shows that he or she cannot pay it as an allowance but only in the form of his or her house and company, this may be exceptionally ordered.
Maintenance will be proportional to the means of the maintenance debtor and the needs of the maintenance creditor. In setting maintenance, the possibility of the latter supporting himself or herself will also be examined.
The needs of the maintenance creditor depend on whether they are children, adult children continuing their training or education, or simply adults. These were already mentioned in the reply to the question 'What do the concepts “maintenance” and “maintenance obligation” mean in practical terms? Which persons have to pay a maintenance allowance to another person?’
With regard to the maintenance debtor's means which is to be considered, it is important to note the specific criteria to be taken into account, depending on whether the maintenance is being set for children or former spouses.
Maintenance set for children
The duty of child maintenance is a fundamental duty of their parents. It is based directly on Article 36(5) of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic.
Maintenance due to children must be proportional to the means of the maintenance debtor.
In accordance with the case-law principle of the Portuguese Supreme Court of Justice (Supremo Tribunal de Justiça), in order to calculate the amount of maintenance due to a child the court must consider not only the value of the income currently earned by the debtor, but also, in a comprehensive and overarching manner, their social status, their ability to work, the duty to actively strive for a profession that enables them to fulfil such duty, and the entire range of assets which they own.
Maintenance set for former spouses
In determining the amount of maintenance due to former spouses the court must take into account the duration of the marriage, the contribution made towards the family finances, the age and state of health of the spouses, their professional qualifications and employment possibilities, the time they will have to devote to bringing up joint children, their earnings and income, remarriage or cohabitation and, in general, all circumstances affecting the needs of the spouse receiving the maintenance and the possibilities of the maintenance debtor.
According to the majority of national case-law, the creditor spouse has no right to demand that the standard of living they enjoyed during marriage be maintained.
The time from when maintenance is due
Maintenance set by judicial decision is due from the date on which the action was brought. Maintenance set by agreement of the parties and approved by decision of the court or the Registrar is due from the date on which the debtor is in default. The debtor is in default on the date set for payment or, failing that, when they are demanded to make payment. Without prejudice to the cases mentioned above, Portuguese law does not provide for setting maintenance retroactively.
Amendments to maintenance that has been set
If there is a change in circumstances after maintenance has been set, maintenance may be amended or terminated.
If there is no pending special maintenance enforcement, the application to amend or terminate maintenance is brought alongside the condemnatory action. If there is a pending special maintenance enforcement, the application to amend or terminate maintenance is joined to the enforcement procedure.
The maintenance debtor may request that maintenance be reduced or terminated if, for example, there is a reduction in their financial means, an improvement in those of the maintenance creditor, the maintenance creditor reaches majority, or the maintenance creditor is able to contribute to their sustenance.
The maintenance creditor may request that maintenance be increased if, for example, their economic situation worsens, their family circumstances change, their needs increase, the cost of living increases and this increase can and should be supported by the maintenance debtor (because, for example, their salary has also increased).
In order to cope with the rising cost of living, the decision setting maintenance may determine that the arbitrated amount undergo a regular automatic update (usually annual).
The update may be based on the increase in the rate of inflation published annually by the National Institute of Statistics (Instituto Nacional de Estatística) or on an increase of a certain interest rate indicated by the court. It may also consist, however, of a fixed annual increase of a certain amount as stipulated in the decision.
The judge is responsible for determining this automatic update and choosing the appropriate means of achieving it, according to their discretion. The automatic update may also be determined by an approved agreement between the parties.
In addition to definitive maintenance, provisional maintenance may also be set.
If definitive maintenance has not yet been set, the court may, at the request of the maintenance creditor or ex officio, if the latter is a minor, grant provisional maintenance which will be determined at the court's discretion. Provisional maintenance is never refunded. It is due while the main proceedings to set the amount of definitive maintenance are pending. Definitive maintenance is due once it has been set.
In the event that contested divorce proceedings are pending, the judge may set provisional maintenance for one of the spouses or the children while the proceedings are pending. While proceedings to regulate parental responsibility are pending, the judge may also set provisional maintenance for minor children. In the aforementioned cases, provisional maintenance may be set during a hearing within the process itself.
Alternatively, provisional maintenance may be set in precautionary proceedings that will be joined to the main proceedings in which definitive maintenance is set.
Maintenance will be paid under the terms and to the person indicated in the court decision or in the court-approved agreement of the parties.
As a rule, if the beneficiary is an adult not subject to incapacity, or an emancipated child, the maintenance will be paid to him or her directly.
If he or she is an adult subject to incapacity, the maintenance will be paid to the party that is under the legal obligation to exercise their financial rights on their behalf (guardian, trustee or judicial property administrator); even an institution may receive the maintenance.
If the beneficiary is a minor, the maintenance will be paid to the person who has custody, who may be one of the parents, another family member, a third party (foster family) or the director of an institution to which the minor has been entrusted.
The law does not impose fixed methods of payment and the parties may agree on how payment is to be made. If there is no agreement, the courts decide on the most practical and least costly method for either the person paying or the person receiving the maintenance.
Generally, the monthly maintenance payment is paid in cash and must be delivered to the creditor at the beginning of the month to which it relates.
The time and place of payment are set out in the agreement or decision setting the maintenance. If these have not been set out, the standard rules of the Civil Code apply in that regard. These rules state, in principle, that in the absence of stipulation:
The most common methods are bank transfer, deposit into an account opened at a bank, sending of a postal order or cheque, or the personal delivery of cash.
In the event that the maintenance debtor defaults, the maintenance creditor may resort to civil and criminal enforcement measures.
Civil enforcement measures
In the case of child maintenance, set in maintenance enforcement proceedings or proceedings to regulate parental responsibility, the law makes a pre-enforcement hearing available to the maintenance creditor.
The beneficiary of child maintenance may call on a pre-enforcement hearing as laid down in Article 48 of the General Regime of the Civil Custody Procedure (Regime Geral do Processo Tutelar Cível), provided that the following conditions apply: non-payment or delay in payment of maintenance; the maintenance debtor receives regular income from employment, a pension, subsidies, commissions, percentages, fees, bonuses, contributions or similar income.
The application is joined to the proceedings to regulate the exercise of parental responsibility or the proceedings for setting child maintenance, which are heard before the court. The maintenance debtor is notified to pay maintenance within ten days of the date when it became payable. If the maintenance debtor fails to attach documentary evidence of payment, the maintenance payments will be deducted on a monthly basis from their wages, salary, pension, subsidies or other income of which they are in receipt. To this effect, the bodies responsible for payment will be notified to process the monthly deduction and deposit it directly into the maintenance creditor's nominated bank account. The amounts deducted also cover maintenance payments becoming due.
Once they have been notified, all persons or entities who are responsible for processing or paying the aforementioned income thereby assume the role of approved depositaries of the amounts deducted as maintenance. As a result, if they fail to deduct the agreed amount, enforcement will be brought against them as part of the ongoing proceedings.
The amounts deducted do not cover maintenance accrued before the notification for the maintenance debtor to make payment. However, maintenance payments which are falling due are covered. In order to recover the maintenance accrued prior to the notification laid down in this hearing, the maintenance creditor will need to bring enforcement proceedings. Thus, when maintenance is due to minors, nothing prevents the lender from simultaneously bringing both pre-enforcement hearings (for the payment amounts falling due) and special maintenance enforcement (for the payment of overdue amounts).
It is not necessary to use a pre-enforcement hearing before resorting to enforcement. It just offers an alternative to enforcement. Opposition is not permitted, but on the other hand, the maintenance creditor has more limited means at their disposal than in enforcement, as the maintenance creditor may only request deductions from salaries, wages, pensions, subsidies or similar periodic income (they may not request the seizure of property, deposits or credit rights).
If maintenance is due to minors, the maintenance creditor may, alternatively, just bring special maintenance proceedings, as laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure. Thus, in a single action, they may recover in full the amounts due or falling due. During enforcement proceedings, the maintenance creditor may resort to broader means of enforcement such as seizure and the pledge of income. The process involved in these proceedings will be explained below.
In the case of child maintenance set in proceedings to regulate parental responsibility, the law also makes a non-compliance hearing available to the maintenance creditor as provided for in Article 41 of the General Regime of the Civil Custody Procedure.
Alternatively, the creditor may request the hearing provided for in Article 48 of the General Regime of the Civil Custody Procedure. This hearing is for the creditor to request the court to order the necessary steps to enforce compliance and to sentence the defaulter to pay a fine. With the request joined to proceedings, the court summons the parents to a meeting or notifies the defendant to plead as they deem appropriate, within five days.
The parents may agree to amend the regime set. In the absence of an agreement, the judge will decide provisionally on the request and refer the parties for mediation or to a specialised technical hearing. If it still proves to be impossible to reach an agreement, the parents are notified to submit pleadings. This is followed by disclosure, the trial and judgement.
Special maintenance enforcement
In any cases where there is a delay in the payment of maintenance, the maintenance creditor may bring special maintenance enforcement proceedings in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure. This rule applies whether the maintenance is due to children or adults, and whether the maintenance is definitive or provisional.
During special maintenance enforcement, the petitioner may request: the adjudication of a proportion of the amounts, salaries or pensions of which the other party is in receipt; or the pledge of income belonging to the maintenance debtor.
This adjudication or pledge takes place independently of seizure and is intended to cover the payment of both due and falling due amounts.
When the petitioner requests the adjudication of amounts, salaries or pensions, the body responsible for paying these or for processing the respective payrolls will be notified that it is to pay the adjudicated part directly to the petitioner. The amount adjudicated must be deposited monthly in the petitioner's bank account, who shall indicate the respective number in the initial application.
If the petitioner requests a pledge of income, he or she must indicate the property to which this applies and the enforcement agent will order that the property considered sufficient to meet the maintenance due and falling due be pledged. The defendant may be heard for this purpose.
If, once the pledge has been made, it transpires that the income pledged is insufficient, the petitioner may indicate other property. If, on the other hand, it transpires that the income is excessive, the petitioner is obliged to reimburse the excess to the defendant, as and when the excess is received. The defendant may also ask for the pledge to be limited to part of the property or to be transferred to other property.
The amounts adjudicated or the value of the pledge of income should be sufficient to cover overdue payments, the interest on arrears when the maintenance creditor requests as such, payments falling due and automatic updates, if these have been set.
The maintenance creditor may still request the seizure of the maintenance debtor's property. This seizure may focus on movable and immovable property, bank deposits, credit rights, commercial establishments or shares.
If the seized property is sold to pay off a maintenance debt, the return of the excess to the maintenance debtor should not be ordered unless payment of maintenance falling due is assured to the extent that the judge considers appropriate, unless a security or other suitable guarantee is provided.
The maintenance debtor should only be summoned after the seizure/adjudication/pledge of income has taken place. The maintenance debtor's opposition to the enforcement or seizure does not stay the enforcement.
In the case of a request to amend or terminate maintenance payments while the special maintenance enforcement is pending, the request for amendment or termination is joined to the enforcement.
European enforcement order
In the event of non-compliance with a maintenance agreement arising from an authentic instrument conducted before administrative authorities, or an instrument authenticated by such authorities, in a Member State not bound by the Hague Protocol of 2007, the maintenance creditor may call upon Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of 21 April 2004 which lays down a European Enforcement Order (Article 4(3)(b) of the aforementioned Regulation and Article 68(2) of Regulation 4/2009 of 18 December 2008).
Criminal enforcement measures
Article 250 of the Criminal Code provides for and punishes the crime of violating maintenance obligations with imprisonment of between one month and two years or a fine of up to two hundred and forty days, depending on the cases laid down therein.
Criminal proceedings require a complaint to be lodged.
If the obligation is then fulfilled, the court may waive or set aside the period of the sentence not served in full or in part.
In principle, all the debtor's seizable property that is liable for the enforcement debt in accordance with substantive law may be subject to enforcement. Seizure is limited to the assets required to pay the enforcement debt and foreseeable enforcement costs.
In addition, the law lays down the limits on seizure and limitation periods of maintenance obligations mentioned below.
Limits on seizure
There are certain kinds of property that may not be seized under any circumstances (absolutely unseizable property), others that may be seized only in certain circumstances (relatively unseizable property) and others that may only be partially seized (partially seizable property).
Absolutely unseizable property
In addition to goods exempt from seizure by special provision, the following are absolutely unseizable:
Relatively unseizable property
The following property is relatively unseizable:
Cash or bank deposits resulting from the settlement of unseizable credit, cannot be seized, in the same terms in which the credit existed originally.
When a maintenance claim is recovered, the aforementioned rules on absolute and relative seizability apply.
As a rule, when it comes to property partially seized during maintenance enforcement, the amount that can be seized is higher than in enforcement founded on other claims, as will be explained below.
Partially seizable assets
Two-thirds of the net salaries, wages, periodic amounts received as retirement pension or any other social benefits, insurance, accident indemnity, annuity, or payment of any kind that ensure the maintenance debtor's sustenance are unseizable.
This unseizability has a maximum limit equivalent to three national minimum wages at the time of each seizure and a minimum limit, when the maintenance debtor has no other income, equivalent to one national minimum wage. When the outstanding debts are for maintenance, an amount equivalent to a full non-contributory pension cannot be seized.
When seizing money or bank balances, the amount equivalent to the national minimum wage is unseizable or, in the case of maintenance obligations, the amount equivalent to a full non-contributory pension.
The unseizability laid down for salaries, wages or periodic payments cannot be combined with the unseizability laid down for money or bank balances.
In 2019, at the time of writing of this factsheet, the value of a non-contributory pension is €210.32 and the value of the national minimum wage is €600.00.
If the aforementioned rules on seizability are not observed, the maintenance debtor may object to the seizure.
The Portuguese Civil Code lays down a limitation period of five years for overdue maintenance payments. So, five years after the due date of the maintenance payments, the right to these payments is prescribed due to non-use. The limitation period is interrupted by summons for legal proceedings concerned with maintenance payments. For their part, the maintenance debtor may waive the limitation after the expiration of the statute of limitations.
In the case of child maintenance, the limitation period does not start or elapse while the child does not have a representative. Even if the child has a representative, the limitation period does not come to end earlier than one year from the date on which the child reached majority.
Portuguese civil procedural law does not lay down a limitation period after which the maintenance creditor can no longer bring maintenance enforcement proceedings. Prescribed maintenance payments may therefore be subject to enforcement. In this case, the court may not be aware, ex officio, of the prescription. In order to be effective, the prescription must be invoked by the maintenance debtor, who may object to the enforcement on that basis.
Opposition to seizure
The general deadline for opposing seizure is ten days from the maintenance debtor being notified of the seizure. The general deadline for opposing enforcement is twenty days from the maintenance debtor being summoned.
In the case of special maintenance enforcement, the maintenance debtor is only summoned for the enforcement after the seizure, adjudication or pledge of income has taken place. Along with the summons, they are notified of the seizure that has already taken place.
In the case of pre-enforcement hearings in juvenile court, the maintenance debtor is notified before being ordered to pledge income but is unable to oppose. They may only provide documentary evidence of payment.
In the case of child maintenance, the Public Prosecutor is entitled to bring the respective proceedings in order to set maintenance. Anyone may notify the Public Prosecutor of the need to set or amend child maintenance. As such, the Public Prosecutor has a public consultation service in every court.
Yes, in the case of child maintenance. It is known as the Guarantee Fund for Maintenance due to Minors (Fundo de Garantia de Alimentos Devidos a Menores), hereinafter referred to as the Fund). The Fund is managed by the Social Security Financial Management Institute IP (Instituto de Gestão Financeira da Segurança Social IP).
The Fund is responsible for ensuring the payment, to a certain extent, of maintenance due to minors. The payment is made by order of the competent court.
The requirements to set the Fund's guarantee in motion are as follows:
In 2020, at the time of updating of this factsheet, the IAS is €438.81. The IAS amount is, in principle, updated annually; the relevant national legislation should always be consulted for the applicable amount.
Limits on payment
If the above requirements are verified, the State guarantees monthly maintenance payments up to the limit shown below.
For each maintenance debtor, the monthly maintenance payments granted may not exceed 1 IAS, regardless of the number of minor children.
Within this limit, the value of the payments to be guaranteed by the Fund must be set by the court. In setting this value, the court takes into account the economic capacity of the household, the amount of the maintenance set and the specific needs of the child.
The Fund does not guarantee overdue payments. Payments guaranteed by the Fund are due from the first day of the month following that in which the court's decision set the guaranteed value.
Payment is guaranteed until the maintenance debtor begins to effectively comply with their obligation.
Payments from the Fund cease when the child reaches eighteen.
Children admitted to public or private non-profit social support institutions, financed by the State, legal persons under public law, private law or public utility, educational guardianship centres and detention centres are not entitled to maintenance payments guaranteed by the Fund.
Applications for setting the amounts payable by the Fund must be submitted to the court during non-compliance proceedings. The Public Prosecutor or the maintenance creditor is responsible for submitting the application.
The judge orders an inquiry based on the child's needs and then makes their decision to set the payments to be made by the Fund within the limits indicated above.
In cases where maintenance is urgently due, the judge may set provisional maintenance to be guaranteed by the Fund until a final decision is reached.
The maintenance creditor must prove each year that they still meet the requirements to guarantee these payments from the Fund, otherwise they will come to an end.
The child's legal representative or the person to whom their custody has been granted has a duty to inform the court or the Fund of any changes to, or the ending of, the situation of non-compliance or the child's situation.
The Fund is subrogated to the rights of the child, up to the limit that it paid, for the purposes of claiming reimbursement from the maintenance debtor.
If the maintenance creditor is in Portugal and wishes to recover maintenance in another Member State of the European Union, they must submit the application to the Directorate-General of Justice Administration (Direcção Geral da Administração da Justiça), which is a public entity. National legislation does not provide for the intervention of a private organization for such purposes.
The Directorate-General of Justice Administration is the Portuguese Central Authority for the purposes of applying Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations (hereinafter also referred to as Regulation).
This Regulation enables the cross-border recovery of maintenance. The Regulation applies to decisions handed down in Member States of the European Union (also known as Member State) and decisions handed down in non-Member States of the European Union (also referred to as third State). It applies not only to decisions that set maintenance made after its entry into force, on 18 June 2011, but also to those made before this date. It covers the recovery of overdue and falling due payments, automatic updates set by the decision and interest on arrears. Under the Regulation, maintenance set by court order or by decision of another competent authority may be recovered.
The application for recovery of maintenance in another Member State is submitted to the Directorate-General of Justice Administration by completing and adjoining the appropriate forms annexed to the Regulation. The creditor must attach certain documents and information to the forms, which can be, as appropriate: a certificate of the judgement or decision setting the definitive maintenance along with notice that the decision/judgement has been rendered final and unappealable which should consist of the form contained in Annex I to the Regulation; document showing they benefited or are in a position to benefit from legal aid or free proceedings; bank details to deposit the amounts recovered; birth certificates of minor children; school attendance certificates for their adult children; the power of attorney granted to the central authority; a list of the amounts due.
The form or forms to be completed and the documents and information to be attached by the maintenance creditor are found in instructions that can be obtained from the Directorate-General of Justice Administration. The contact details of this body are listed in the reply to the question, ‘If so, how can that authority or private organisation be contacted?’
The type of proceedings that can be requested of the Directorate-General of Justice Administration are explained in the reply to the question: ‘If so, how can that authority or private organisation be contacted and what kind of assistance can I receive?’
The contact details of the Portuguese Central Authority are:
Directorate-General of the Administration of Justice,
Av. D. João II, 1.08.01 D/E
1990-097 LISBON - PORTUGAL
Tel (351) 21 790 65 00
Languages: Portuguese, Spanish, French and English.
In its role as the Central Authority under the aforementioned Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008, the Directorate-General of Justice Administration will provide the necessary support as described in the reply to the question ‘If I am in this Member State and the debtor has his/her residence in another country: Can I obtain the assistance of an authority or private organisation in this Member State?’
If the maintenance creditor is in another Member State and wishes to request the application of one of the proceedings laid down in the Regulation, they should file the application with the central authority appointed by the Member State where they are based. This central authority, in turn, forwards the request to the Portuguese central authority who takes charge of passing it on to the competent national court, as appropriate.
If the applicant is in another Member State, they should be able to contact the Directorate-General of Justice Administration via the central authority of the Member State where the applicant is based.
The following assistance may be provided:
In order to recover maintenance set by a decision handed down in another Member State, the Regulation lays down three different sections of rules:
(i) rules applying to decisions handed down in a Member State bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol (as is the case with Portugal);
(ii) rules applying to decisions handed down in a Member State not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol;
(iii) rules applying to decisions handed down in all Member States.
The decisions laid down in the section referred to in (i):
The decisions laid down in the section referred to in (ii):
The decisions laid down in the section referred to in (iii):
The Regulation sets out the procedures that are available to maintenance creditors in Article 56. In some cases, these procedures cover not only decisions of the Member States but also decisions of third States.
Specifically, the maintenance creditor may:
These procedures are governed by the law and rules of jurisdiction of the requested Member State, unless other arrangements are laid down in the Regulation. In such cases, the maintenance creditor is aided and represented by the central authority or other public authority, body or person appointed by the requested Member State.
Yes, Portugal is bound by the Hague Protocol of 2007. As such, the following rules of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 apply to maintenance judgements handed down in Portugal: Articles 8, 13 and 17 to 22.
The answer to this question is nullified by the affirmative answer to the previous question.
Portuguese national law contains rules which provide legal aid comparable to that set out in chapter V of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December of 2008.
With regard to natural persons, the following are entitled to legal aid, provided that they are able to prove their economic insufficiency:
National legislation provides for the application of the following criteria for assessing the economic insufficiency of natural persons:
Legal advice enables the party to consult a lawyer in order to obtain technical information on a specific dispute before bringing or contesting an action in court.
Legal aid, in turn, may be granted in the following terms:
Legal aid covers the specific costs resulting from the cross-border nature of the dispute.
Thus, in the case of an application for legal aid submitted by a citizen from another Member State for an action in which the Portuguese courts have jurisdiction, legal aid comprises the costs of translation, interpretation and travel expenses of persons who are to appear in Court when their presence is required and/or the Court considers that they could not otherwise be heard.
In the case of an application for legal aid requested by a Portuguese citizen in order to bring an action for which the courts of another Member State have jurisdiction, legal aid covers the pre-litigation support, until the proceedings have been instituted in another Member State, and the costs of translating the requirements and other documents.
If the recipient of legal aid loses the action, the system for reimbursing advance payments and expenses paid by the successful party is the same for all categories of individual beneficiaries indicated above, without discrimination between them.
However, rules exist in national law that provide less extensive legal aid than that provided for in Chapter V of the Regulation and therefore must be supplemented by this.
In Portugal, minors are exempt from fees when they are represented by the Public Prosecutor or by a court-appointed lawyer.
Minors or their legal representatives are also exempt from costs in appeals against decisions relating to the application, amendment or termination of maintenance, handed down in juvenile court proceedings.
Parties in juvenile court proceedings and actions against the status of a person are exempt from prior payment of court fees. According to national legislation, majority is reached at the age of eighteen.
However, prior payment of court fees cannot be demanded in proceedings brought in Portuguese courts and to which the Regulation applies. This is the case whether these proceedings relate to children or to adults, whatever the form of the process and whether or not a maintenance request overlaps with a request on the status of persons (Article 44 of the Regulation).
In such proceedings, if the applicant does not qualify for legal aid or free proceedings, the court fee may be demanded at the end. Moreover, the proceedings laid down in Article 56 of the Regulation, where the obligation of parents to provide maintenance for a child under twenty-one years of age is concerned (Article 46 of the Regulation) must be completely free.
The aforementioned rules of the Regulation are directly applicable and extend, internally, the scope of legal aid afforded by national legislation.
In accordance with the aforementioned Article 51 of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008, the Directorate General of Justice Administration, as the Portuguese central authority, provides assistance in those proceedings laid down in the Regulation and will take all appropriate measures to that end.
In particular, its responsibilities are:
In order to achieve these goals, the Portuguese State, and in particular the Directorate General of Justice Administration, as the central authority, adopted the following measures:
The Contact Point, the courts or other entities and authorities are not bound by the information contained in this factsheet. It is also still necessary to read the legal texts in force. These are subject to regular updates and evolutionary interpretation of case-law.
The national language version of this page is maintained by the respective EJN contact point. The translations have been done by the European Commission service. Possible changes introduced in the original by the competent national authority may not be yet reflected in the translations. Neither the EJN nor the European Commission accept responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice to see copyright rules for the Member State responsible for this page.
Member States in charge of the management of national content pages are in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.