1.) How can ‘third-party notice (TPN)’ be described in general:
‘Third-party notice’ is a formal notification of a pending or ongoing lawsuit that is given by one of the parties to the proceedings to a third party who has hitherto not been involved in them . The notification may include a request to intervene in the lawsuit. The notifying party submits to the court a corresponding written document, which is then formally served on the third party by the court. The third party is not obliged to intervene as a result of the third-party notice but is legally free to decide whether to join the proceedings and, if so, on behalf of which party. A third party who does join the proceedings does not become a party to the dispute, but is merely an intervener, whose statements and actions must not conflict with those of the main party. An intervener cannot be required to pay any costs. However, if the main party wins the case, the intervener is entitled to have their costs reimbursed by the opposing party.
Anyone given the opportunity through a third-party notice to influence the course of proceedings as an intervener, can, even if they did not intervene in the proceedings, base claims for damages on grounds of poor litigation only on court proceedings prior to their intervention or on substantive issues that they could not prevent even as an intervener or, if they did not intervene, could not have prevented. By supporting the party in respect of whom they intervene, the intervener can contribute to the success of that party’s lawsuit and thus avoid recourse proceedings against themselves, or at least improve their position in such a lawsuit.
2.) What are the main effects of judgments on persons given TPN:
The third party notice presupposes that one party in an ongoing lawsuit has reason to fear an unfavourable outcome, but also has reason to expect that if the outcome is unfavourable they will then be able to make a claim against the third party. Thus, the party issuing the third-party notice has an interest in either not losing the initial lawsuit (and here the intervener may be able to assist) or, if they lose this lawsuit, in recovering their losses by winning in subsequent proceedings against the third party.
At the same time, the notifying party, by giving TPN, prevents the notified third party from being able in subsequent proceedings to bring certain damages claims against it on grounds of poor litigation: A third party given TNP and thereby given the opportunity to influence the outcome of a lawsuit may base claims for damages on grounds of poor litigation only on court proceedings prior to their intervention or on substantive issues that, even as an intervener, they could not prevent or could not have prevented. The intervener may enter pleas in law and submit procedural documents, provided that they do nothing that contradicts the main party. In the event of a subsequent lawsuit between the main party and the intervener, the effects of the final judgment in the initial proceedings shall extend to the intervener or to those who despite being invited to do so did not intervene in the proceedings, in so far as these persons as parties to a subsequent lawsuit may not enter any pleas which are in conflict with the key elements of the ruling in the initial lawsuit.
3.) TPN has no binding effect on the decision on points of law in the main lawsuit.
4.) The outcome of the initial lawsuit is not binding if the intervener was prevented from entering pleas in law either by the state of the lawsuit at the time of the intervention or by statements and actions of the main party (for example, because that party did not contend certain facts or claims).
5.) As already stated, the effects of the third-party notice apply irrespective of whether the third party becomes involved in the (main) lawsuit as an intervener or not.
6.) The third-party notice has no effect on the relationship between the third party and the adversary of the party who issues the third-party notice, unless the third party intervenes in support of the adversary.
In this regard, reference is made to the related information provided by Austria in the European e-Justice Portal under the section, ‘Bringing an action before a court’, ‘Enforcement of court decisions’, ‘Enforcement proceedings’ at the following URL.
- in Austria, the district court ‘Bezirksgericht’, where the enforcement proceedings are pending. In the case of applications for a decision that there are no grounds for non-recognition (Article 36(2)), and in the case of applications for refusal of recognition (Article 45), the competent court is the district court in the area where the party bound by the judgment is registered or established.
- in Austria, the higher level regional court (Landesgericht), via the district court (Bezirksgericht), where the enforcement proceedings are pending
- in Austria, the supreme court (Oberste Gerichtshof) via the district court (Bezirksgericht), where the enforcement proceedings are pending.
German is the only language which is accepted.
- in Austria: § 99 of the Law on Court Jurisdiction (Jurisdiktionsnorm)
- in Austria: § 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung)
The national language version of this page is maintained by the respective Member State. The translations have been done by the European Commission service. Possible changes introduced in the original by the competent national authority may not be yet reflected in the translations. The European Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice to see copyright rules for the Member State responsible for this page.
Member States in charge of the management of national content pages are in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.