Procedural acts must be performed by specific deadlines (‘términos’) or within the time periods (‘plazos’) stipulated by law.
A deadline specifies the time by which a given procedural act must take place.
A time period specifies the time available for carrying out the process. Periods may be expressed in days, weeks, months or years.
If the law does not stipulate a time period or deadline, it is to be understood that the act must be performed without delay.
However, the criterion of proportionality needs to be applied, and Article 6(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) introduce the concept of reasonable time (which takes account of factors such as the complexity of the case, how long the type of case in question would normally take, the interests of the litigant and his or her procedural conduct, the conduct of the authorities or the consideration of available resources). However, if the court fails to respect the concept of reasonable time, this will affect the right enshrined in Article 24(2) of the Spanish Constitution.
Moreover, failure by the courts and court staff to observe the deadlines and time periods without good reason will result in disciplinary action under the Organic Law on the Judiciary (Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial). This is without prejudice to the injured party’s right to claim any damages that may be due.
In addition to the procedural time periods, there is the separate issue of time limits for the exercise of substantive legal rights (limitation and prescription).
With regard to the regulation of administrative procedures, Regulation No1182/71 is currently transposed into national law by Article 48 of the Law establishing the Legal Regime governing Public Bodies and the Common Administrative Procedure (Ley de Régimen Jurídico de las Administraciones Públicas y del Procedimiento Administrativo Común). Article 48 provides as follows:
The calendar must be published before the start of each year in the relevant official gazette and other media to ensure that it is made known to the public.
WEB LINK to the calendar of working days in 2020:https://www.boe.es/eli/es/res/2019/11/27/(5)
Non-working days for the purpose of judicial proceedings are laid down in Article 182 of the Organic Law on the Judiciary. This provides as follows:
Under Article 183 of the Organic Law on the Judiciary, days in August are non-working days for all judicial procedures, with the exception of procedures declared to be urgent by procedural laws.
The rules are set out in Articles 130 to 136 of Chapter II, Title V, Book I of Civil Procedure Law (Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil) 1/2000, as amended by Law 42/2015 of 5 October 2015.
The main features of the current rules are as follows:
a) All judicial procedures must be carried out on working days and during working hours:
Working days are all days of the year other than Saturdays and Sundays and national, regional and local public holidays. Days in August are also non-working days and the courts will not send legal practitioners electronic notifications on these days, unless they are deemed to be working days for the purposes of the formalities in question.
Working hours are from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. unless the law stipulates otherwise for a specific procedure. For notification and enforcement purposes the hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. are also deemed to be working hours.
By way of exception, for certain procedures, such as submitting bids in an electronic auction, the time limit is defined in terms of calendar days, and there are no nonworking hours. Article 649 of the Civil Procedure Law lays down a period of twenty calendar days from the start of the auction, and the auction will not close until one hour after the last bid is made, provided that this is higher than the previous highest bid, even if this means that the initial twenty-day period is extended by up to 24 hours.
b) Days and times may be deemed working days and hours for the purposes of procedures deemed urgent, i.e. where a delay could be seriously detrimental to the parties concerned or to the proper administration of justice, or could make a court ruling ineffective. (Examples include non-voluntary admission to a psychiatric hospital, and judicial measures taken in the best interest of minors in conflicts arising from civil proceedings.) This may be done at the initiative of the court or at the request of the party concerned, and may be ordered by either the legal counsel or by the court itself, as the case may be.
In any event, urgent measures can be taken in August without the need of express authorisation. Similarly, authorisation is not required if urgent measures initiated during working hours must necessarily be continued in non-working hours.
c) With regard to the calculation of the time periods, the period starts to run from the day following that of the legal notification of the start of the period, and includes the last day of the period, which ends at midnight.
However, where the law stipulates that a time period starts to run as soon as another one expires, it will start to run from the day following the expiry of the former period, without any need for fresh notification.
d) For submitting claim documents (Article 135 of the Civil Procedure Law) there are two means of communication between the court and the litigants:
1) In hard copy, for natural persons who are not represented by a court representative (procurador) (which is generally the case where the claim is for less than €2 000) or where the document cannot be submitted in digital form.
2) Through the courts’ online and electronic systems. These are mandatory for legal practitioners and for certain litigants even when not represented by a court representative (for example, legal persons, notaries and registrars: see Article 273 of the Civil Procedure Law). Parties may also choose to use these systems even when not required to do so. Where documents are submitted electronically, confirmation is provided in the form of an electronic receipt that is issued automatically. Practitioners may submit pleadings and other documents electronically 24 hours a day, every day of the year. Where a document is submitted on a non-working day or outside working hours, it will be deemed to have been submitted at the start of the next working day. There is also provision for time periods that are about to expire to be extended where a mandatory document cannot be filed by the time limit due to an unplanned interruption to the online submission service.
Whatever submission method is used, any documents that are subject to a time limit may be submitted up until 3 p.m. on the working day following that on which the time period expires.
In proceedings in the civil courts, claim documents may not be submitted to the duty court.
e) Time periods cannot be extended: if a party fails to observe the time limit he or she forfeits the opportunity to carry out the procedural act in question.
The general rule in Article 151 of the Civil Procedure Law is that notice of all decisions issued by the courts or legal counsels must be served within three days of the date of the decision or the publication date.
Article 151(2) states that where notice is served on the Public Prosecutor, the Government Legal Service, Counsel for the Cortes Generales and the Legislative Assemblies or Counsel for the Legal Service of the Social Security Administration or other Autonomous Community bodies or Local Government organisations, and where notice is served via the Professional Bodies representing Court Procedural Representatives, it will be deemed to have been given on the next working day after the date of receipt recorded in the formal record, or in the confirmation of receipt where notice has been served electronically or online. Where notice is sent after 3 p.m. it will be deemed to have been received on the following working day.
Where notice of a decision is served by a bailiff or by post, the relevant date is the date on which the document is delivered by the bailiff or the postal service and signed for on receipt.
Where notice is served by publication under Article 164 of the Civil Procedure Law because the defendant’s address is not known, the period starts to run from the day following that on which it is posted on the court notice board or published either in the Official State Gazette or electronically, as applicable.
Where copies of documents submitted by court representatives need to be transferred to the court representatives of the other parties, Article 278 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that if by law the act transferred triggers the start of a time period in which a procedural step needs to be taken, that period will start to run without the involvement of the court and will be calculated from the date following that recorded on the copies that were transferred or the date on which they are deemed to have been transferred where delivered electronically.
The calculation begins on the day following that on which the event that by law triggers the start of the time period took place.
Non-working days are excluded from calculations of time periods, except as explained above for bids in electronic auctions, where the period is expressed in calendar days.
When calculating time periods for urgent actions, days in August are not classed as nonworking days: only Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays are excluded from the calculation.
Time periods expressed in months or years are calculated from one date to another. Spanish legislation does not provide for any time periods expressed in weeks.
If there is no equivalent to the starting date in the last month of the period, the expiry date is taken to be the last day of the month.
Where a time limit expires on a Saturday, Sunday or other non-working day it will be deemed to be extended until the next working day.
Time periods cannot be extended. However, periods can be interrupted and deadlines extended where they cannot be complied with for reasons of force majeure. In these cases, the clock starts again when the reason for the interruption or extension has ceased. The court, either of its own motion or at the request of the party affected by the situation, must find evidence of such a situation of force majeure at a hearing attended by the other parties (see the answer to question 13).
The time limits for the various types of appeal are laid down by law and cannot be extended. For appeals to the next higher court (recursos de apelación) and to the Supreme Court (recursos de casación) the time period is 20 days from the day following notification of the judicial decision (Article 458 and 479 of the Civil Procedure Law).
The statutory time limits cannot be extended. In some cases the law requires the court to fix a specific date and time for an act.
By way of an exception, there is provision for periods to be interrupted and deadlines to be extended in the event of force majeure:
a. The general provision is contained in Article 134(2) of the Civil Procedure Law. The legal counsel, either of his or her own motion or at the request of the party affected by the situation, must find evidence of such a situation of force majeure at a hearing attended by the other parties. An appeal for review of the counsel’s decision may be filed with the court.
b. Once a date has been set for a hearing, if any of those summoned to appear is unable to do so for reasons of force majeure or for similar causes, they must inform the court immediately, providing evidence of the reason, and request a new hearing or decision (Article 183(1) and Articles 189 and 430 of the Civil Procedure Law). A new hearing is announced if the evidence of the situation is accepted and if this situation prevents the following from attending: the lawyer (Article 183(2) and Article 188(1)(5) and (6) of the Civil Procedure Law); a party whose presence is necessary because he or she is not assisted by a lawyer or has to be questioned; (Articles 183(3) and 188(4) of the Civil Procedure Law); or a witness or expert. In the latter case, the witness or expert may instead be called to examine the evidence outside the hearing, once the parties have been heard (Article 183(4) of the Civil Procedure Law).
c. The time limit for a person in contempt of court to request annulment of a final judgment can be extended in the event of force majeure (Article 502(2) of the Civil Procedure Law).
d. Where evidence is examined before the trial takes place (which may be authorised by the judge under Article 293 et seq. of the Civil Procedure Law if there is a well-founded fear that it will not be possible to examine the evidence at the usual stage of the proceeding), the application must be filed within two months of examination of the evidence, unless it is proved that it was not possible to initiate the trial within that time period for reasons of force majeure or similar causes (Article 295(3) of the Civil Procedure Law).
The two parties may by mutual agreement also apply for proceedings to be suspended without giving reasons or in order to enable them to try and reach an agreement or settlement or to submit to mediation or arbitration. Proceedings may not be suspended for more than 60 days or until the mediation is completed (Article 19(4) and Article 415 of the Civil Procedure Law).
If an application for legal aid is made, there are two possible scenarios, covered by Article 16 of Law 1/1996 of 10 January 1996 (the Legal Aid Law), as amended by the abovementioned Law 42/2015:
1. If the application is made when the proceedings are already under way, in order to prevent the right to an action being prescribed or either party being denied the right to a trial due to expiry of the time period, the legal counsel or the administrative body, of its own motion or at the request of the parties, may order the period to be suspended until there is a decision on whether or not to grant legal aid, or there is a provisional appointment of a lawyer and court representative in cases where legal representation is either mandatory or required in the interests of justice, provided that the application was made within the time periods laid down in the civil procedure legislation.
2. When the application for legal aid is made before the start of proceedings and the action may be adversely affected by the expiry of the limitation or prescription periods, these periods will be interrupted or suspended, respectively, until there is a provisional appointment of a legal aid lawyer and, if required, a court representative, handling the case on behalf of the applicant; and, if no such appointment can be made, until a definitive administrative decision is issued on whether or not to grant legal aid.
In any case, the limitation period will restart when the applicant is notified of the provisional appointment of a lawyer by the Bar Association (Colegio de Abogados) or, where applicable, when the Legal Aid Board issues its decision on whether to grant legal aid and, in any event, within two months of the application being made.
Should the application be refused, be clearly abusive and intended merely to extend the time periods, the court dealing with the case may calculate the time periods in the strictest terms permitted by law, with all of the consequences arising therefrom.
In oral proceedings involving eviction on the grounds of non-payment or the expiry of the time limit, Article 441(5) of the Civil Procedure Law provides for another case of suspension of proceedings when the social services confirm that the household affected is in a situation of social and/or economic vulnerability The Court Registrar, upon receipt of the communication, will suspend the proceedings until the measures deemed appropriate by the social services are adopted, for a maximum period of one month from receipt of the communication from the social services to the court, or within three months if the claimant is a legal person. Once the measures have been taken or the period has elapsed, the suspension will be lifted and the procedure continued.
In general, a party who fails to comply with a time period or deadline loses the right to perform the action in question (Article 136 of the Civil Procedure Law). Some of the most significant examples are as follows:
Where a party is informed that the deadline for a particular action has expired, prompting the start of the next procedural stage, or where a party’s submission or application is rejected on the grounds that it is out of time, the party may appeal against the decision. This is the case, for example, if the defence to a claim is rejected on the grounds that it was submitted after the deadline.
Someone who has been convicted in absentia and on whom judgment has been served in person may appeal only by means of an appeal to the next higher court (recurso de apelación) or to the Supreme Court (recurso de casación). These appeal routes are also available where notice is served by publication in official publications or electronically. In both cases the appeal must be filed within the period stipulated by law (Article 500 of the Civil Procedure Law).
Where someone has persistently failed to appear in court, they may seek to have a final judgment set aside if they were unable to appear in court or were unaware of the existence of the proceedings for reasons of force majeure (Article 501 and following of the Civil Procedure Law).
The national language version of this page is maintained by the respective EJN contact point. The translations have been done by the European Commission service. Possible changes introduced in the original by the competent national authority may not be yet reflected in the translations. Neither the EJN nor the European Commission accept responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice to see copyright rules for the Member State responsible for this page.
Member States in charge of the management of national content pages are in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.